1-Step vs 2-Step Challenge
Education library

Prop Firm Basics6 min read

1-Step vs 2-Step Prop Firm Challenge: Which Should You Choose?

Prop firms typically offer evaluations in one of two structures: a single-phase format, usually called 1-Step, and a two-phase format, usually called 2-Step. Both test the same underlying skill — trading profitably inside a fixed drawdown limit — but they distribute the profit target differently, which changes the practical experience of sitting the evaluation and how forgiving it is of an uneven run of trades.

Neither format is inherently easier in a way that shows up in overall pass rates, because pricing and target sizing are generally calibrated by the firm to offset the structural differences. The right choice comes down to how you personally trade and how much you value speed versus a second confirmation phase.

How the 1-step format works

A 1-step evaluation has a single profit target to hit, and once it is reached without breaching the drawdown rules the account moves straight to funded status. On MixFunded's 1-Step evaluation, that target is 10% of the starting balance, against the same 5% daily and 10% maximum drawdown limits used across the standard programs.

The appeal of a 1-step format is straightforward: there is only one number to reach, and once reached the process is over. This suits a trader who wants to get to a funded account as quickly as their strategy allows, without a second qualifying stage after the first target is already met.

How the 2-step format works and why it splits 8%/5%

A 2-step evaluation splits the requirement across two phases. On MixFunded, phase one requires an 8% profit target and phase two requires a further 5%, with the same 5% daily and 10% maximum drawdown limits applying throughout both phases and into the funded stage.

The split into two smaller targets rather than one larger one exists because it lets a firm observe a trader's process twice under live conditions before allocating real payouts, rather than relying on a single result that could be influenced by a lucky run. From the trader's side, phase two's smaller 5% target is often easier to reach precisely because it is smaller, which can offset the extra time cost of a second phase.

Which format suits which trader

A trader with a strategy that produces fairly consistent, moderate returns tends to do well on either format, since the total combined target across a 2-step (8% then 5%, effectively similar in overall scope to a 1-step's 10%) is not dramatically different in aggregate. The practical difference is more about pacing and confirmation than about total difficulty.

A trader who trades in bursts — for example, someone whose edge shows up clearly around specific volatile sessions rather than every day — may prefer a 1-step format because there is no need to repeat the qualifying process after already proving it once. A trader who values a second, independent checkpoint before capital is allocated, or who wants the psychological benefit of a smaller second target after clearing the first, may prefer the 2-step.

  • 1-Step: single 10% target, fastest route to funded status
  • 2-Step: 8% then 5%, two smaller checkpoints instead of one larger target
  • Both use the same 5% daily and 10% maximum drawdown limits on MixFunded

Cost and pricing considerations

Evaluation pricing reflects account size rather than format on MixFunded, with the same $45, $95, $175 and $299 pricing tiers for the $10,000, $25,000, $50,000 and $100,000 account sizes applying to both the 1-Step and 2-Step programs. This means the format decision does not need to be driven by cost — it should be driven purely by which structure fits how your strategy performs over time.

Whichever format is chosen, the profit split once funded is the same 80/20 in the trader's favour, and the minimum of three trading days before a payout can be requested applies equally to both. The structural choice at entry does not change the economics of trading once an account is funded.

Frequently asked questions

Is a 1-step or 2-step challenge easier to pass?

Neither is inherently easier in aggregate, since a 2-step's combined 8% plus 5% targets and a 1-step's single 10% target represent broadly similar total ground to cover, both under the same 5% daily and 10% maximum drawdown limits on MixFunded. The practical difference is pacing: a 1-step reaches funded status in one phase, while a 2-step splits the process into two smaller checkpoints.

Do 1-step and 2-step challenges cost different amounts?

On MixFunded, pricing is set by account size rather than by format, so a given account size costs the same whether you choose the 1-Step or 2-Step evaluation. The decision between formats should be based on how your trading style fits each structure rather than cost.

Does the profit split change between formats?

No. Both the 1-Step and 2-Step programs move to the same 80/20 profit split once an account is funded, and both require a minimum of three trading days before a payout can be requested.

Trade it on a funded account

MixFunded evaluations start from $5. Payouts are processed every Monday in USDT (TRC-20) and published on-chain.